I kind of like William Lane Craig but his arguments mostly dissolve into assertions no better than personally testimony.
They normally take the following form:-
1) Cosmological Argument
2) Objective Moral Values
3) Fine Tuning universe designed for life
5) Good god
Over the next few weeks I'm going to go through them one by and refute them all, ok maybe not refute but at least reduce them down to assertions. They all have things in common you cannot absolutely disprove them but then you cannot disprove god or flying dragons or pixies.
However we can reduce them to assertions.
Almost forgot joined the British Humanist Association they are an organisation that fit me almost perfectly.